After watching the recent movie release “American Fiction”, I just had to pick up a copy of the book it was based on. “Erasure” is a masterclass in storytelling that challenges and entertains from start to finish.
The story is about Thelonious “Monk” Ellison, a black writer struggling to find his place in a literary world that often marginalises voices like his own. Frustrated by the lack of attention his serious novels receive, Monk decides to take matters into his own hands by writing a parody of stereotypical ghetto fiction. What follows is an exploration of authenticity, privilege, and the commodification of black culture.
This book is a multifaceted take on parody, satire, and the African American experience through the lens of literary fiction. With its blend of postmodern narrative techniques, Percival Everett challenges conventional notions of authorship and artistic expression and how they relate to race in America. This was a tricky book for me to get through speedily, particularly the first few chapters. However, it ended up being a satisfying read as it served up thematic richness, clever narrative strategies and interesting social commentary.
Parody as Subversion
“Black culture is often co-opted and commodified by mainstream society”.
“Erasure” is a bold experiment that draws inspiration from iconic works such as “The Color Purple” while subverting its tropes and themes. Central character Monk embarks on a journey to write a deliberately “trashy” novel as a lampoon response to commercially successful ghetto fiction in the literary space. “Erasure’s” meta-narrative allows for a critique of both the publishing industry’s fixation on racial stereotypes and broader societal expectations placed on African American authors.
Percival Everett’s use of parody blends elements of irony and pastiche to deconstruct conventional narrative and literary norms. When Monk writes his parody tale in this book, his satirical portrayal of black characters like Sharonda and Van Go exposes the unreasonableness of recurring clichéd narratives and its effect on preconceptions about racial groups, namely blacks. Monk’s parody novel “My Pafology” incorporates inconsistent grammar, spelling, and misuse of vernacular language / AAVE, highlighting subversion but also Monk’s bitterness for being pigeonholed as a ‘black writer’.
One of the most absorbing aspects of “Erasure” is its portrayal of Monk Ellison as a complex and deeply flawed protagonist. Despite his intelligence and talent, Monk is far from perfect; he grapples with feelings of inadequacy, frustration, and self-doubt, all of which still make him a deeply relatable and sympathetic character. As he navigates the publishing industry, I couldn’t help but root for him, while simultaneously cringing at some of his more questionable decisions and superiority.
Cultural Commodification
Beyond “Erasure’s” parodic prose, the book showcases satire brilliantly, mocking the publishing industry and its commodification of Black stories. Through Monk’s interactions with editors, agents, and producers, we’re exposed to the inherent biases and commercial pressures that shape the literary marketplace. The novel’s portrayal of Monk’s reluctant embrace of commercialism, juxtaposed with his artistic integrity, emphasises the dilemmas faced by marginalised authors/individuals in a profit-driven industry.
The invented author Stagg R. Leigh, Monk’s pseudonymous alter ego, symbolises the erasure of authentic voices in favour of marketable stereotypes. By adopting the persona of Stagg R. Leigh, Monk confronts the contradictions of identity within a white-dominated landscape. However, his charade as Stagg ultimately reinforces the very stereotypes he seeks to critique, highlighting the complicity of both producers and consumers in perpetuating racial caricatures. It’s an industry like all media that values sensationalism and marketability over diverse authenticity.
As a Black individual part of the diaspora, the topic of Black Cultural Commodification speaks to my experience as a minority person living in the West. There are many notable examples of the commodification of blackness in the mainstream. The praxis, history and humanity of Black and/or African experiences, have been co-opted by the mainstream in the West which is then widely disseminated to non-Blacks/Africans; “the commodification of black life for white profit“. Monk in “Erasure” does touch upon how many artists achieve commercial success by emulating or appropriating black cultures often without acknowledging their privilege to do so, or respecting the cultural origins.
There is often a fine line between genuine representation and superficial tokenism. For example, a Netflix original series may showcase diverse characters and storylines, but if the narratives are created or controlled by predominantly white producers and writers, their agendas may be catering to the marketplace’s fascination with a certain type of Blackness. A raw, gritty realness of a South London estate, A vulgar African American tale of gangs, drugs and baby mamas. These prolific representations aren’t unfounded or unreasonable but do foster a weird air of delusion, guilt-forced compassion and a cultural ‘celebration’ that ultimately fetishises blacks and panders to the masses.
I think this conversation reflects broader power dynamics and inequalities in society. So It’s important for people to critically examine how culture is represented and consumed, and its basis in reality. Considering “Erasure” was a book published in 2001, it’s curious yet unsurprising that the issues the book discusses are still relevant.
“Media texts are re-presentations of reality, intentionally composed. Distorted perceptions and stereotypes within these texts contribute to perpetuating attitudes, so when depictions of a community are of value that upholds ideas of Fetishisation, Criminality, Illiteracy, and Economic and Health disparities, public perception is impacted. Without media, our perception of reality would be limited, so we need these re-presentations to accurately mediate our worldview and help shatter the more harmful prejudices”.
Identity & Artistic Integrity
One of the poignant aspects of “Erasure” is its handling of how identity and art intertwine. Thelonious “Monk” Ellison’s struggles in this book reflect tensions within the African American community, where the pursuit of success often comes at the expense of cultural authenticity. Through Monk’s existential crisis and eventual reconciliation with his identity, I thought about how much weight can be felt when one has an ego-driven desire for external validation.
The novel’s intertextual references to texts such as Ralph Ellison’s “Invisible Man” provide additional layers of symbolic meaning, echoing themes of invisibility, alienation, and self-discovery/agency. Hence why there’s a critical significance of the title, “Erasure” and the placing of the concept of race under erasure, extending its literal meaning.
To fully appreciate the thematic depth of “Erasure,” it was essential for me to contextualise the novel within the broader history of African American literature and notable cultural texts. Works such as John A. Williams’s “The Man Who Cried I Am” and Ishmael Reed’s “Flight to Canada” offer valuable insights into the complexities of racial identity and cultural representation. Similarly, Clarence Major’s “My Amputations” provides an alternative perspective on the challenges faced by African American writers in a predominantly white literary space. Like the movie adaptation “American Fiction”, “Erasure” includes quite a few intertextual references and codes. Also, the use of flashbacks and comedic narrative devices gives the book its metaphorical symbolism.
“I don’t believe in race. I believe there are people who will shoot me or hang me or cheat me and try to stop me because they do believe in race, because of my brown skin, curly hair, wide nose, and slave ancestors.”THELONIOUS “MONK” ELLISON
One of the most impressive aspects of this book is how Percival Everett seamlessly blends humour with intellectual insight, creating a narrative that is as thought-provoking as it is entertaining.
At its core, “Erasure” is a book about the power of storytelling to both reflect and shape the world around us. Through Monk’s journey, Percival Everett reminds us that literature has the power to challenge our assumptions, broaden our perspectives, and ultimately, change the way we see the world. In an age of increasing polarisation and division, “Erasure” reminded me that empathy, genuine understanding, and the willingness to engage with ideas are important.
Check out my review of the movie “American Fiction”.
“Hypotheses non fingo” refrain from making assumptions or speculative theories without solid evidence.
Monk’s quote from the book relates to Monk’s assumptions about stereotypes and his rejection of pigeonholing and tokenism. Monk as the protagonist, embodies an individualism and a refusal to conform to societal expectations. The Latin quote also infers that Monk isn’t attempting to point a finger but merely to capture a viewpoint
